![]() ![]() So I think there is a slight advantage of using an Iridient based workflow or using in camera JPEGs for sharpness and speed, but it's not worth the tradeoffs for me, so I'm happy with the pure Lightroom workflow. If you're mostly viewing photos at screen resolution without much cropping, then it's not really noticeable.Īs color colors, setting to Lightroom's simulation of Fuji simulations is very close, as you said, and imo not a reason to use the JPEGs on its own.Īs for speed, I think Lightroom might be faster if you work with Iridient-processed DNGs, but they take up more space, around 70MB per photo in my test. Iridient Developer/Transformer output is also slightly sharper. If you pixel peep at 1:1, the Fuji in camera JPEGs are slightly sharper. In the latest versions (latest patch on LR6 or CC), it's much better. Lightroom processing for Fuji in older versions was bad. Hopefully Photo Ninja will reward us with something more than a point release update with no features.I think what you're doing is fine for most purposes, and it's what I'm doing. Support added for 3:2 aspect ratio mode RAF images from the Fujifilm GFX 50S which were added in the latest 3.0 firmware update. I'm cautiously curious about On1's offering. They confirmed they are doing a digital asset manager to work with their Affinity Photo. I'm hopeful Affinity gets their converter up and running before long. IR then uses that filename to reopen the RAW file in ID and in the process overwrite the TIFF from LR. LR creates a TIFF file when you open the file in LR. I wish Adobe would improve the processing algorithms and lots more but it's not in the cards probably. You open the RAW file in LR and then choose to edit the file in an external editor that they give instructions on how to configure and invoke. It's a lot more flexible and you can always round-trip to another converter easily enough. It does everything at least good enough and some things very very well. It is noted for its ability to process Fujifilm X-Trans raw files. I tried Alien Skin's product but the conversions were terrible. Iridient Developer, formerly Iridient RAW Developer, is a commercial and proprietary raw image format processing. Plus it doesn't really do much that Lightroom doesn't already do. SilkyPix actually has gotten to be fairly decent but their interface is still non-standard and they don't seem to want to hire native English speakers to do their translations. Support added for RAW images from the Fujifilm X-T5. Developer 3.9.1 Novem(Maintenance Release) New Features: Support added for RAW images from the Canon EOS R6 Mark II. Same issues I have with Dark Table, Raw Therapee, and Raw Photo Processor. Iridient Developer 3.9.1 and X-Transformer 2.7 have been released with Fujifilm X-T5 support, and you can download Developer here and Transformer here. It's a personal reason that wouldn't apply to everyone: I hated the interface. Iridient Developer 3.0 is an advanced RAW image conversion application for Mac OS X. I tried Iridient Developer but trashed it pretty quickly. LR at least has the default Fuji ones out of the box. There's too much chicanery required to get film simulations for Fuji or you have to buy them. I've tried CaptureOne and the latest version I like more than the previous ones but I don't really mesh with it like I would like. My biggest issues with PN is the lack of good film simulations (the default stuff they have is pretty rudimentary in my opinion), the lack of using the optical lens corrections provided in the raw file, and a terrible file based browser. Photo Ninja is nice but they have gone 2 years now promising their version 2.0 that hasn't appeared yet. It's not perfect but once you nail down the sharpening a lot of the problems people have with LR go away. It does very well and has a broader range of integration and tools than the other choices. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |